What happened to global warming?

Unbiased... Hmmm, I'm not sure if anything objective in any topic truly exists as it is nearly impossible for people to completely divorce themselves from their core beliefs.

However, I do think Richard muller's recent conclusions are telling as he is very skeptical and reportedly receives lots of funding from the petroleum industry. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2011/11/03/its-science-not-skepticis_n_1072419.html

He concluded that climate change is man made. Now the question is how bad and how fast.

As for additional evidence, go look for it. Consider the IPCC, a clearinghouse for such research, for a start.

 

NASA ? Can't trust your own gubment :wileyC:

 

Wasn't the ozone supposed swallow the earth like 30 years ago..lol

Again, whos to say the earth didnt get hotter before the ice age. Or that the sea level didnt rise then aswell. You cant. Just like u cant prove we are causing this only prove that it is happening. I dont dispute the workd is getting hotter h=just that we DO NOT cause it. Geez Just ride the heat wave

 

treat everthing w/ a healthy does of skepticism, ...here's why:
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html

BTW, ..did you read the newsweek article i provided to you on "global cooling" alarmism from 1975?

 

Missed it , going back now

 

..the IPCC is the "belly of the beast", ... "clearinghouse"??? LOL, only thing they are clearing there are checks written by gullible nations...

even the guy who started the whole thing was caught admitting it was alarmism, and the data isn't panning out the radical claims, ....and the climate-gate email leaks didn't help their case either

 

.
I am seriously thinking about a S/C ... but wifey say NO at the moment ...
But ... if I do get the S/C ... there will be some big time global warming from the ... "asphalt melting effect" ... ...
.

 

well that was interesting , I did a bit of digging on that paper's author , Peter Gwynne


http://www.examiner.com/article/peter-gwynne-author-of-the-the-cooling-world-newsweek-1975

Here's an excerpt

Thank you for your note. You've hit on a point that has bugged me for a few years now, ever since I learned that the deniers of global warming were using my Newsweek piece to support their position. As you correctly point out, the article summarized the science of the time. Since then, numerous climate-sensing satellites have gone into orbit and theoretical understanding of atmospheric chemistry has improved considerably. I have occasionally thought of publishing an update to the article, but I’ve always decided that such an action would garner unwanted notoriety without changing any minds.
*

 

Got quiet in here all of a sudden

 

Bueller ?

 

so, he says they were forecasting blind basically because they didn't have good enough technology back then?? LULZ, that's hillarious, ... good thing we didn't write him any checks back then, ...but this time, ...this time, we can "trust" him...

 

Nice try

 

so we all agree greenhouse gases are BAD for the environment, that they cause problem with the atmosphere. We also all agree that we pump a shit load of it out daily into the air as well. But people don't agree those gases are harming the atmosphere?

 

sorry oz, ...but these guys have zero credibility.. they blew it in the 1970's w/ "global cooling alarmism", blew it in the early 2000's w/ global warming and the ridiculous hockey stick graph, which means they "double down' and cry "climate change".... zero.... credibility...

the whole point to selling snake oil is to get the money and haul ass before the unwitting victim finds out... they failed at their own game... well, we're onto them and giving chase

 

Well I guess a) is out , leaving us with b) " global warming " and c) " climate change "

Glad we can finally agree on something Wiley

 

Nice try x2

 

...oz, it wasn't multiple choice...

 

Terribly insensitive, isn't it?

http://www.drroyspencer.com/research-articles/satellite-and-climate-model-evidence/

 

a) is out

 

thanks, but i'm not "trying" anything other than to keep my money and sovereignty... if you want to write checks to this bunch, go ahead, save the world, ...but i think i'll take my chances