1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Access Cab I4 / V-6

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas' started by PhoenixCadet, Jun 17, 2008.

  1. Jun 17, 2008 at 4:25 PM
    #1
    PhoenixCadet

    PhoenixCadet [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Member:
    #7309
    Messages:
    1,801
    Gender:
    Male
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    11 Reg Cab 2.7L 4x4
    Now that I know it's possible to get an I4 with an access cab (auto), here's another question. I've been told by some that due to the size/weight of an access cab, it would be better simply to get a V-6 versus an I4. (With the reasoning that it wouldn't have to work as hard.)

    Any comments or opinions on this?
     
  2. Jun 17, 2008 at 4:38 PM
    #2
    tcBob

    tcBob Gringo Bandito Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Member:
    #1
    Messages:
    8,199
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bob
    SoCal
    Vehicle:
    07 PreRunner SR5 V6 Black
  3. Jun 17, 2008 at 4:42 PM
    #3
    lsocoee

    lsocoee My hair is all natural Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Member:
    #872
    Messages:
    10,104
    First Name:
    Hotdog
    Vehicle:
    2007 PreRunner SR5 Double Cab
    Wet Okole Underwear
    What do you plan on doing with your Tacoma? I bet the 4 cylinder can handle most people's day to day requirements. I think if you plan on towing or doing a lot of heavy hauling, then you should consider the 6.

    The 4 cylinder gets phenomenal gas mileage and performs well enough.
     
  4. Jun 17, 2008 at 4:50 PM
    #4
    Janster

    Janster Old & Forgetful

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Member:
    #1138
    Messages:
    13,686
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Jandy
    Lancaster, PA
    Vehicle:
    2007 4.0L 4x4 TRD Sport Access Cab A
    Advantage Torza top (tri-fold), Husky floor mats, RuffTuff seat covers, C2C hood struts, Homelink mirror, USA Spec PA15-Toy (120gig Classic & 8gig nano), Garmin Nuvi 660, Protecta Bed mat, Pop-n-lock, TSB Springs, Scangauge II, Heated drivers seat, Fumoto drain valve, Aries pushbar, PIAA 540 fog lights, Hood scoop grahics, Flowmaster 50 series dual catback exhaust, RainX Latitude windshield wipers, Husky rear floor liner (ontop of folded down seats). Console Vault.
    Not exactly sure what you're asking...... What are your reasons for considering an 4cyl in the first place?

    A 4cylinder access cab and a 6cylinder access cab are gonna be able to handle & haul the same loads if they have identical suspensions & options. You'll just have a lack on power in the 4cylinder if & when you actually tow/haul stuff (pending how much you haul). They both have the same hauling & towing capabilities.

    The Pre-runner 2.7L access cab also has the same towing capabilities. The Pre-runner actually has a larger payload (1580lbs) than the 4x4 4.0L access cab (1360lbs).

    So - what's your question?
     
  5. Jun 17, 2008 at 4:59 PM
    #5
    Ridgerunner

    Ridgerunner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Member:
    #5269
    Messages:
    3,616
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Frank
    San Francisco
    Vehicle:
    2001 prerunner doublecab limited
    2001 with; cat-back twin exhaust,elbow mod, Westin bullbar with Hella550's, Snugtop XTR camper shell, TRD off-road 2x4-black beauty.
    I read alot of happy 2.7 owners right here:)
     
  6. Jun 17, 2008 at 5:25 PM
    #6
    007Tacoma

    007Tacoma I dub thee malicious!

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Member:
    #643
    Messages:
    6,705
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mark
    San Antonio, TX
    Vehicle:
    2003 4Runner SE 4WD
    I was very happy with my 2.7L PreRunner Access Cab, but I needed the extra towing capacity and the 4 doors. So, I traded it in for my current truck.

    The link tcBob gave you is my move from Houston to San Antonio with the "old" truck. It handled everything fairly well with the exception of the 4,000+lb load in the hills. The 2.7L loves to rev high, and it does great on the low end. However, it suffers greatly on the top end. Thus my highway fuel economy at 75 MPH was around 22 MPG. I can get 21 MPG out of my V6, so I didn't see much reason in having the 4 cylinder.

    I hope this helps you make your decision. Either way - both engines are wonderful and serve the purpose without hesitation.
     
  7. Jun 17, 2008 at 5:34 PM
    #7
    PhoenixCadet

    PhoenixCadet [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Member:
    #7309
    Messages:
    1,801
    Gender:
    Male
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    11 Reg Cab 2.7L 4x4
    Sorry if I didn't make my question clearer before. I've been told that if I get an access cab, I should simply get the V-6 because the I4 isn't a big enough engine to efficiently pull the weight of an access cab. I wanted to see if there's any truth to that.

    I personally won't be doing any (heavy) hauling or crazy off-roading, if that helps. I'm simply talking about the truck itself (and no extra cargo [e.g. trailers, etc.]).
     
  8. Jun 17, 2008 at 5:52 PM
    #8
    007Tacoma

    007Tacoma I dub thee malicious!

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Member:
    #643
    Messages:
    6,705
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mark
    San Antonio, TX
    Vehicle:
    2003 4Runner SE 4WD
    In which case the 2.7L is a great engine. Check out that link. I did quite a bit with mine. My problem was that my projects were getting bigger and the engine wasn't...
     
  9. Jun 17, 2008 at 5:55 PM
    #9
    PhoenixCadet

    PhoenixCadet [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Member:
    #7309
    Messages:
    1,801
    Gender:
    Male
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    11 Reg Cab 2.7L 4x4
    Roger that. Thanks for the info.
     
  10. Jun 17, 2008 at 6:05 PM
    #10
    Jerseyguy

    Jerseyguy Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Member:
    #6389
    Messages:
    12
    Sparta, NJ
    Vehicle:
    '08 SR5 Access Cab 4x4 Indigo Pearl
    I've had my '08 4WD Access cab with the 2.7L I4 & 5 spd. for about 3 months now and 5,500 miles. I have no problems with it's power, but I think the manual trans. definitely helps get the most out of the 4 cylinder.

    Granted, it's a huge departure from the 300HP 5.3L Silverado I traded in, but it does just fine - and the 23.5 MPG ain't bad either! :thumbsup:
     
  11. Jun 17, 2008 at 11:59 PM
    #11
    Janster

    Janster Old & Forgetful

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Member:
    #1138
    Messages:
    13,686
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Jandy
    Lancaster, PA
    Vehicle:
    2007 4.0L 4x4 TRD Sport Access Cab A
    Advantage Torza top (tri-fold), Husky floor mats, RuffTuff seat covers, C2C hood struts, Homelink mirror, USA Spec PA15-Toy (120gig Classic & 8gig nano), Garmin Nuvi 660, Protecta Bed mat, Pop-n-lock, TSB Springs, Scangauge II, Heated drivers seat, Fumoto drain valve, Aries pushbar, PIAA 540 fog lights, Hood scoop grahics, Flowmaster 50 series dual catback exhaust, RainX Latitude windshield wipers, Husky rear floor liner (ontop of folded down seats). Console Vault.
    And I honestly don't see any problems with the 4cylinder not being able to *pull its own weight* per say.... Surely it's not gonna be as good as the 6cylinder.

    But with the gas savings you'll get with the 4....do you really care about all that?
     
  12. Jun 18, 2008 at 12:08 AM
    #12
    LRH

    LRH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Member:
    #2159
    Messages:
    303
    GA USA
    Vehicle:
    '07 2.7L PreRunner
    A PreRunner Access cab, with man trans, and 4cyl weighs only ~320lbs more than a similar reg cab PreRunner, not enough more to make the V6 a must have.
     
  13. Jun 18, 2008 at 12:13 AM
    #13
    PhoenixCadet

    PhoenixCadet [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Member:
    #7309
    Messages:
    1,801
    Gender:
    Male
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    11 Reg Cab 2.7L 4x4
    I take it there's no way you can get a PreRunner in an automatic?
     
  14. Jun 18, 2008 at 2:59 AM
    #14
    Roland

    Roland My other ride has sails

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2008
    Member:
    #4149
    Messages:
    2,406
    Gender:
    Male
    Rhode Island
    Vehicle:
    06 Impulse Red I4 2WD Access Cab
    UnderCover Tonneau, Bed mat, Bug Deflector, aFe Pro Dry S, Secondary Air Filter removed, Synthetic 5W-30 oil, Scanguage II with blendmount, WeatherTech floorliners, Toyota seat covers, Installed OEM intermittent wipers, TacomaWorld sticker, Defrost without AC mod, Hidden Hitch
    Hey Pheonix! The 4 cylinder has plenty of power for almost anything you'll ever need to do with a mid sized truck. It even has more HP than the smaller V6 Ford is selling (I LOVE teasing my coworker about his.) I've noticed you're looking for an automatic but I'd like to suggest to you that you learn to drive a manual. It's a skill that will serve you well and in most vehicles you'll get extra performance and mileage.
     
  15. Jun 18, 2008 at 4:45 AM
    #15
    HardCase

    HardCase Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Member:
    #5087
    Messages:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    Kalispell, Montana
    Vehicle:
    '08 Regular-cab 2.7/5-speed manual
    2" trailer hitch, grill-guard, bed mat, ScanGaugeII
    If you aren't going to be doing any heavy hauling or towing, the I4 is plenty of engine for you, and especially now in the day of $4+ gas. Mine is a regular-cab with a manual, so maybe a little lighter than an access-cab, but it has all the power I need and gets decent mileage to boot. Plus the 2.7L engine has an amazing reputation for long-term durability.....not saying that the V6 is unreliable by any means, but Toyota's 4cyl truck engine will last a very loooooonnnnnng time if you take reasonably good care of it.
     
  16. Jun 18, 2008 at 9:21 AM
    #16
    PhoenixCadet

    PhoenixCadet [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Member:
    #7309
    Messages:
    1,801
    Gender:
    Male
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    11 Reg Cab 2.7L 4x4
    Thanks for the info, sir.

    BTW - I plan on learning to drive a manual soon. My dad (who's got a '97 regular cab Taco) is going to teach me.

    How many more miles per gallon does a manual I4 Taco get versus the automatic? (I've read what the Toyota site says - but I'd like to get some personal opinions here.)
     
  17. Jun 18, 2008 at 9:33 AM
    #17
    007Tacoma

    007Tacoma I dub thee malicious!

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Member:
    #643
    Messages:
    6,705
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mark
    San Antonio, TX
    Vehicle:
    2003 4Runner SE 4WD
    I don't think the manual gets that much better. It isn't because of the transmission. It is because of the final drive gear ratio. The PreRunner Access Cabs come with a 4.10 gear ratio and only come in Manual 5 speed. The same goes for the 2.7L 4x4 and Regular Cab PreRunners. That gives you excellent get-up-n-go, but really hurts your fuel economy. The only way to get Automatic (and 3.58 rear differential ratio) is to go to the regular suspension. Then you can upgrade your wheels/tire/suspension if you wish.
     
  18. Jun 18, 2008 at 9:47 AM
    #18
    Roland

    Roland My other ride has sails

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2008
    Member:
    #4149
    Messages:
    2,406
    Gender:
    Male
    Rhode Island
    Vehicle:
    06 Impulse Red I4 2WD Access Cab
    UnderCover Tonneau, Bed mat, Bug Deflector, aFe Pro Dry S, Secondary Air Filter removed, Synthetic 5W-30 oil, Scanguage II with blendmount, WeatherTech floorliners, Toyota seat covers, Installed OEM intermittent wipers, TacomaWorld sticker, Defrost without AC mod, Hidden Hitch
    On a couple other threads I mentioned that the last few tanks I've been getting 28 MPG +/- a couple tenths. This is due to a tonneau cover and a couple small mods and paying attention to my scangauge. If I really tried I bet I could squeeze 30+ MPG out of it but it would take some of the more extreme hypermiling techniques that aren't very practical in every day driving.
     
  19. Jun 18, 2008 at 12:02 PM
    #19
    PhoenixCadet

    PhoenixCadet [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Member:
    #7309
    Messages:
    1,801
    Gender:
    Male
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    11 Reg Cab 2.7L 4x4
    I've been thinking about getting one of these for the specific reason of improving MPG (when I get the truck, of course). I did a quick Google search and found a few "cheap" ones (compared to others) at around $200-$250. I don't want a hard-top type, but rather, one of the softer ones. How much would a soft-cover improve one's MPG?
     
  20. Jun 18, 2008 at 12:05 PM
    #20
    007Tacoma

    007Tacoma I dub thee malicious!

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Member:
    #643
    Messages:
    6,705
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mark
    San Antonio, TX
    Vehicle:
    2003 4Runner SE 4WD
    I did not notice a difference with my Access (AgriCover) Limited Edition, but it is worth EVERY PENNY I have spent on it. I had it on my 2.7L, and then I moved it to my Double Cab V6. It is the best accessory for a truck - PERIOD.
     
To Top